Author name: Steve Fitschen

Steven W. Fitschen is the President of the National Legal Foundation

Federalist No. 37: Concerning the Difficulties of the Convention in Devising a Proper Form of Government

From the Daily Advertiser. Friday, January 11, 1788. To the People of the State of New York: IN REVIEWING the defects of the existing Confederation, and showing that they cannot be supplied by a government of less energy than that before the public, several of the most important principles of the latter fell of course […]

Federalist No. 37: Concerning the Difficulties of the Convention in Devising a Proper Form of Government Read More

Federalist No. 20: The Same Subject Continued (The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union)

From the New York Packet. Tuesday, December 11, 1787. To the People of the State of New York: THE United Netherlands are a confederacy of republics, or rather of aristocracies of a very remarkable texture, yet confirming all the lessons derived from those which we have already reviewed. The union is composed of seven coequal

Federalist No. 20: The Same Subject Continued (The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union) Read More

Federalist No. 19: The Same Subject Continued (The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union)

To the People of the State of New York: THE examples of ancient confederacies, cited in my last paper, have not exhausted the source of experimental instruction on this subject. There are existing institutions, founded on a similar principle, which merit particular consideration. The first which presents itself is the Germanic body. In the early

Federalist No. 19: The Same Subject Continued (The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union) Read More

Federalist No. 18: The Same Subject Continued (The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union)

For the Independent Journal. To the People of the State of New York: AMONG the confederacies of antiquity, the most considerable was that of the Grecian republics, associated under the Amphictyonic council. From the best accounts transmitted of this celebrated institution, it bore a very instructive analogy to the present Confederation of the American States.

Federalist No. 18: The Same Subject Continued (The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union) Read More

Federalist No. 14: Objections to the Proposed Constitution From Extent of Territory Answered

From the New York Packet. Friday, November 30, 1787. To the People of the State of New York: WE HAVE seen the necessity of the Union, as our bulwark against foreign danger, as the conservator of peace among ourselves, as the guardian of our commerce and other common interests, as the only substitute for those

Federalist No. 14: Objections to the Proposed Constitution From Extent of Territory Answered Read More

Federalist No. 10: The Same Subject Continued (The Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection)

From the New York Packet. Friday, November 23, 1787. To the People of the State of New York: AMONG the numerous advantages promised by a wellconstructed Union, none deserves to be more accurately developed than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction. The friend of popular governments never finds himself so much

Federalist No. 10: The Same Subject Continued (The Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection) Read More

Christian Pro-Life Protester Wins Highly Unusual Victory in First Opinion of Supreme Court’s New Term

On Monday, November 5, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued its first opinion of the October 2012 Term. That opinion was a victory for Christian pro-life protester, Steve Lefemine, and the group Columbia Christians for Life, who were represented by The National Legal Foundation, a Christian public interest law firm. Mr. Lefemine’s case started

Christian Pro-Life Protester Wins Highly Unusual Victory in First Opinion of Supreme Court’s New Term Read More

Scroll to Top