A state may not refuse tax credits for contributions solely because some resulting scholarships go to religious schools.
The ministerial exception covers more than just churches and schools.
Justice Thomas in two concurrences to denial of cert excoriates the Court’s abortion case law.
Project Blitz is attacked with ad hominem, rather than reason.
Abortion is not properly upheld as providing equal rights for women.
Carrying a child to term is not “involuntary servitude under the Thirteenth Amendment
It is not uncommon for philosophers and social commentators to refer to any overarching belief system as a religion. For example, just out from Daniel Mahoney is The Idol of Our Age: How the Religion of Humanity Subverts Christianity (2018), in which he argues that secular humanism is treated as ultimate truth by many and,
In part 1 of this blog, I suggested that a plain reading of the text of the Fourteenth Amendment included the unborn in the class of “any person” to whom are given the benefits of due process and equal protection from the reaches of the States and (through the Fifth Amendment) the Federal Government before
Roe v. Wade has frequently been criticized because it has taken out of the democratic process the decision of when life begins and when a fetus should achieve legal rights. Allowing individual States to make the decisions, those who advance this argument says, will help unify us (at least those of us whose voice can
On September 10, 2018, the Eighth Circuit in Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains v. Hawley (No. 17-1996) smacked the district court for entering a preliminary injunction against Missouri regulations that are designed to improve the safety of abortion surgery. The district court had applied like a blunt instrument the Supreme Court’s latest pronouncement