Supreme Court

Roe and Casey Are No More!

We thank God today for the Supreme Court’s Decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization!  The Court overturned Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.  The Court acknowledged that those two cases were wrong when they declared there is a constitutional right to abortion. We, like many others, hoped against hope that the …

Roe and Casey Are No More! Read More

A Second Chance to Get It Right:  303 Creative at the Supreme Court It is not often that an issue comes before the Supreme Court twice within a space of four years, but that is exactly what has occurred in the same-sex marriage vendor cases.  The first opportunity was in the Masterpiece Cakeshop litigation.  The …

Read More

Both Pro-life and Religious Freedom Cases On Supreme Court Docket–Some Cases to Keep on Your Radar

Pro-life Cases The “big hitter” for this upcoming term is in the pro-life area: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Instead of nibbling around the edges of Roe and Casey, as the abortion cases in the Court for the last several decades have done, Dobbs goes for the heart, with Mississippi arguing that the viability …

Both Pro-life and Religious Freedom Cases On Supreme Court Docket–Some Cases to Keep on Your Radar Read More

NLF Supports Barronelle Stutzman’s Courageous Stand and Fights to Preserve the Freedoms of Speech and Assembly

Recently, the State of Washington’s Supreme Court heard and decided a case dealing with same-sex “discrimination” and First Amendment rights. Currently, a petition is pending in the U.S. Supreme Court concerning the case. In the center of the legal controversy is a Christian woman standing for the sanctity of marriage and standing for her faith. …

NLF Supports Barronelle Stutzman’s Courageous Stand and Fights to Preserve the Freedoms of Speech and Assembly Read More

Out With the Blaine Amendments: A Supreme Court Victory for Religious Freedom and Education

On June 30, 2020, the Supreme Court reiterated the fact that the United States Constitution prohibits discrimination based on religion. In Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue,the Court held that a Montana no-aid provision denying state sponsored scholarship funds to religious schools was unconstitutional.  Such so called “Blaine amendments” (which deny payments from any state …

Out With the Blaine Amendments: A Supreme Court Victory for Religious Freedom and Education Read More

So What Is Roberts Doing?

Chief Justice Roberts has been the center of attention recently, whipsawing both liberals and conservatives with his various opinions.  He sided with Justice Gorsuch and the four “liberals” on the bench in ruling that “sex” in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act includes “sexual orientation” and “gender identity,” and he wrote a somewhat baffling …

So What Is Roberts Doing? Read More

Scroll to Top